He lost that case and a key point in the decision was a finding that he was dishonest about his weight following treatment. He attributed his subsequent problems at work and ultimate dismissal to this disability and said that his employer’s discrimination against him related to that. Following treatment including chemotherapy, he was able to return to work but was left with residual fatigue. He had been a successful research analyst in the City until developing blood cancer. The basis of the claimant’s original case was that he had been unfairly treated by his employers. The issues were only raised at the hearing and related to a key point about the claimant’s weight. It is noteworthy that the defendant’s single joint report was not challenged by either side before the hearing of the case by the tribunal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |